The recent decision by the Pakistani government to shut down the Utility Stores Corporation (USC) has sparked significant debate across the country. Established in 1971, the USC was designed as a state-owned enterprise with the primary goal of providing basic commodities to the public at subsidized rates. Over the decades, the corporation grew to operate nearly 6,000 stores across Pakistan, serving millions of people, especially those from lower-income groups. However, the USC has faced mounting criticism for inefficiency, mismanagement, and corruption, which have overshadowed its original mission.
The Decision to Close USC
The government, under Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, has cited systemic corruption and financial constraints as the driving factors behind the decision to close down the USC. In a recent meeting of the Senate Standing Committee for Industry and Production, the Federal Secretary for Industry and Production, Saif Anjum, confirmed that the government is considering wrapping up the USC as part of a broader right-sizing policy. This decision is part of a series of measures aimed at reducing government expenses and addressing the country’s financial challenges(24 News HD, ARY NEWS).
One of the immediate consequences of this decision is the discontinuation of subsidized sales to consumers under the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP). The government has proposed shifting to a cash assistance model for these beneficiaries instead of providing subsidized goods through USC outlets. This shift is intended to streamline aid delivery and minimize the corruption risks associated with managing such a vast network of stores(The Nation).
Corruption and Mismanagement
Over the years, the USC has been plagued by allegations of corruption and inefficiency. Critics argue that the corporation has failed to meet its objectives, with subsidized goods often being diverted to the black market or sold at higher prices. In addition, the USC’s operational inefficiencies have led to significant financial losses, further straining the national budget. Despite efforts to reform the organization, these issues have persisted, leading to growing calls for its closure(ProPakistani).
Furthermore, private sector competitors, such as Imtiaz Supermarket and other large retail chains, have begun offering similar or better prices on basic commodities. This development has reduced the USC’s relevance, as consumers increasingly turn to these alternatives for their grocery needs. The government's decision to close USC reflects a recognition that the corporation is no longer capable of fulfilling its intended role effectively(ARY NEWS).
Response from USC Employees
The decision to shut down the USC has been met with strong opposition from the corporation’s employees. The three major unions representing USC workers have announced plans for a complete strike and a sit-in protest at D-Chowk in Islamabad, starting August 26. The unions are demanding that the government reverse its decision and reinstate the USC, arguing that its closure will leave thousands of employees without jobs and deprive the public of an essential service(24 News HD).
To address these concerns, the government is reportedly working on a compensation package for USC employees, which may include reassigning them to other government departments. However, details of this package have yet to be finalized, and it remains unclear how the government will manage the transition(The Nation).
A Broader Policy of Right-Sizing
The closure of the USC is part of a broader right-sizing initiative by the government, which aims to streamline public sector operations by reducing the number of state-owned enterprises and ministries. As part of this policy, the government has already decided to abolish several federal ministries, including Information Technology, Kashmir Affairs, and Science and Technology. These measures are intended to reduce administrative overhead and improve the efficiency of government operations(ARY NEWS).
In the coming weeks, the government is expected to finalize and implement its plan to shut down the USC. While the decision has been met with criticism and concern, particularly from those directly affected, the government maintains that this move is necessary to address the country's financial difficulties and curb corruption within state-run enterprises.
The closure of the Utility Stores Corporation marks the end of an era for a state institution that, despite its noble intentions, has struggled to maintain its relevance and integrity in the face of growing challenges. The government’s decision reflects a shift towards more efficient and transparent methods of delivering social welfare, but it also raises questions about the future of public sector employment and the accessibility of affordable goods for the nation’s most vulnerable citizens.
Comments